Neil Abramson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Warren J. Krug; Handen & Singerman; Handen & Krug,defendants-appellees, 902 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-2784-H)
Neil Abramson, appellant pro se.
Edward James Hutchins, Jr., Eccleston & Wolf, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neil Abramson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) for failure to comply with discovery orders. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Abramson v. Krug, C/A No. 88-2784-H (D. Md. Aug. 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
