Stephen P. Kroll, Individually and As Personalrepresentative of the Estate of Sonya P. Kroll,decedent, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 900 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 900 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1990) Argued: Jan. 10, 1990. Decided: March 30, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul V. Neimeyer, District Judge. (CA-86-242-PN)

Allan G. Slan, Katz, Frome, Slan and Beecker, P.A., Kensington, Md., for appellant.

Roann Nichols, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

Shari L. Cohen, Katz, Frome, Slan and Bleecker, P.A., Kensington, Md., for appellant.

Breckinridge L. Willcox, United States Attorney, Susan M. Ringler, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D. Md., 708 F. Supp. 117.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Stephen P. Kroll brought this action for medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act, alleging that his deceased wife received inadequate care at the Bethesda Naval Hospital. The district court conducted a bench trial from October 31 to November 3, 1988, and denied Kroll relief. The record, briefs, and oral argument disclose no findings of fact that are clearly erroneous nor any errors of law. We affirm the judgment for reasons adequately stated by the district court. See Kroll v. United States, 708 F. Supp. 117 (D. Md. 1989).

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.