Unpublished Dispositionstuart D. Peet, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant and Appellee, 896 F.2d 554 (6th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES W. JOINER, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff Stuart D. Peet appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary, who denied plaintiff's application for disability benefits.
The district court concluded that substantial evidence supported the Secretary's determination that plaintiff retained the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work, and that he was, therefore, not disabled.
After careful consideration of the record, the briefs submitted, and the arguments of counsel, we find no error in the opinion and order of the Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's opinion and order entered April 13, 1989.
Honorable Charles W. Joiner, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
