United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Henry Miller, Defendant-appellant, 896 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseJames Henry Miller, appellant pro se.
Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
James Henry Miller appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller, CR No. 84-87-D; C/A No. 88-334-D (M.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We note that the propriety of the district court's denial of Miller's third 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition is not before us because the only notice of appeal in this record relates specifically to the order denying Miller's 60(b) motion
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
