United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Timothy Charles Jones, Defendant-appellant, 894 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseTimothy Charles Jones, appellant pro se.
Eric William Ruschky, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy C. Jones appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Cr. No. 87-284 (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
