893 F.2d 732: Jake Ayers, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, Jake Ayers, Jr., Bennieg. Thompson, Leola Blackmon, Lillie Blackmon,louis Armstrong, Darryl C. Thomas Andleon Johnson, Plaintiffs-appellants,andunited States of America, Intervenor-appellant, v. William Allain, Governor, State of Mississippi, et al.,defendants-appellees

Share |

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. - 893 F.2d 732

Feb. 6, 1990

Robert Pressman, Center for Law & Educ., Cambridge, Mass., Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr., Oxford, Miss., for Ayers, et al.

Linda F. Thome, Jessica Dunsay Silver, Nathaniel Douglas, John R. Moore, Levern M. Younger, Franz R. Marshall, and Zita Johnson-Betts, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Rights Div., Educ., Opportunities Litigation, Sec., Washington, D.C., for the U.S.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Paul Stephenson, William F. Goodman, Jr., Ed Davis Noble, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.

Before GOLDBERG, JOHNSON and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

1

" 'The time has come,' the Walrus said, 'To talk of many things:

2

Of shoes--and ships--and sealing wax--Of Cabbages--and kings--

3

And why the sea is boiling hot--and whether pigs have wings.' "1

4

We'll sit and chat of times gone by, and visit with the queens

5

Brown, and, Sweatt and Meredith not to mention the fertile Green

6

And then we'll see why Ayers should fly and how equality is king!

7

Today we write an opinion concerning a class action lawsuit involving the public universities of Mississippi. The question is whether the racial identity of these institutions results from the free choice of the students or from state policies and practices.

8

A group of plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the Governor of Mississippi, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning of the State of Mississippi, the Commissioner of Higher Education, and other state officials in January, 1975. These private plaintiffs consists of a class certified by the district court as:

9

all black citizens residing in Mississippi, whether students, former students, parents, employees or taxpayers, who have been, are, or will be discriminated against on account of race in receiving equal educational opportunity and/or equal employment opportunity in the universities operated by said Board of Trustees.2

10

They have alleged that the defendants were maintaining and perpetuating a racially dual system of public higher education in violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

11

The United States intervened as a plaintiff shortly thereafter making identical allegations. The private plaintiffs and the United States, collectively referred to as "the plaintiffs," seek an injunction directing the defendants to eliminate all vestiges of the racially segregated system of higher education in Mississippi.

12

The defendants answered the plaintiffs' allegations arguing that the existence of predominantly one race universities does not violate the equal protection clause because Mississippi has implemented, in good faith, a nondiscriminatory admissions and operations policy. The defendants believe that the identifiability of the universities by the racial composition of the student population results from the free and unfettered choice of the students themselves.

13

In the spring of 1987, a five week trial was conducted in Oxford, Mississippi following twelve years of pretrial preparation. The record consists of 4,400 pages of trial testimony and approximately 2000 exhibits. At the end of 1987, the district court ruled for the defendants on the issue of liability and dismissed the plaintiffs' case.3 The plaintiffs appeal.

14

The Mississippi university system consists of eight institutions and several entities under the plenary power of a Board of Trustees (the "Board").4 These universities were segregated by race through the spring of 1962, contrary to the Supreme Court's 1954 mandate in Brown v. Board of Education,5 when our court forced the University of Mississippi to admit its first black student, James Meredith.6 Prior to the admission of Meredith, no black students attended any of the historically white universities and no white students attended any of the historically black universities. The historically white universities were: (1) the University of Mississippi; (2) Mississippi State University; (3) the University of Southern Mississippi; (4) Mississippi University for Women; and, (5) Delta State University. The historically black universities were what are now known as: (1) Jackson State University; (2) Alcorn State University; and, (3) Mississippi Valley State University.

15

At the time of the Meredith decision, the Board had implemented segregative policies encompassing: (1) student enrollment; (2) the maintenance of branch centers by the historically white universities in close proximity to the historically black universities; (3) the employment of faculty and staff; (4) facility provision and condition; (5) the allocation of financial resources; (6) academic program offerings; and, (7) the racial composition of the Board and its staff.7 The Board did not permit black students to enroll at any of the historically white universities under its auspices.8 The years each of the historically white universities first enrolled a black student are as follows:

16

Similarly, white students did not attend a historically black university until the late 1960's:

17
Alcorn State University ................ 1966
Jackson State University ............... 1969
Mississippi Valley State University .... 1970
18

The racial identification of Mississippi's public universities continues to the present day. Undergraduate programs included the following percentages of black enrollment between the years 1973-74 and 1985-86:

19
                                        197374          198081        198586
20

Historically White Institutions

21

9. * The figure for Mississippi State University for 197374 is an average

22

derived from 197273 and 197475 data because data for 197374 are not

23
Note availablle.
Delta State University                  14.3                17.1       17.59
Mississippi State University             5.6  *             11.2        11.0
Mississippi University for Women         9.9                19.3       18.0
University of Mississippi                3.5                 7.0       5.9
University of Southern Mississippi       4.5                11.3       14.24
Historically Black Institutions
Alcorn State University                 99.7                96.9       95.6
Jackson State University                99.6                95.2       91.9
Mississippi Valley State University     99.7                99.8       99.3
24

The racial composition of the graduate programs reflects a similar pattern.

25
                                     197374            198081         198586
26

Historically White Institutions

27

10. ** In 198586, Jackson State University enrolled 59% black, 13.3% white,

28

and 27.7% other-race pupils. For 197374, Mississippi State University and

29

the University of Southern Mississippi are averages of 197273 and 197475

30
Note data because 197374 data are not available.
Delta State University               41.6                  38.3        26.2
Mississippi State University         12.8  **               9.6         8.0
Mississippi University for Women     14.5                  18.0        13.0
University of Mississippi             7.6                   8.4         7.5
University of Southern                9.2  **               8.7         8.1
  Mississippi
Historically Black Institutions
Alcorn State University              0                     99.4        96.0
Jackson State University             91.8                  85.3        59.0**
Mississippi Valley State             0                     94.7        96.7
  University
2

Ayers v. Allain, 674 F.Supp. 1523, 1526 (N.D.Miss.1987)

4

The Board, created in 1932, is the governing body of all of the state universities in Mississippi. The Board consists of 13 members. From 1932 to 1972, the members of the Board were all white. At the time of trial in 1987, three of the thirteen members were black

The governor of Mississippi, with the consent of the Mississippi Senate, appoints twelve members of the Board. Ten must reside in the geographical district that they represent. The other two are chosen at-large from the state. Members serve staggered twelve year terms so that every four years four seats are open for selection.

In addition, a special seat belonging to the University of Mississippi alone, designated the LaBauve Fund seat, has a four year tenure so that the seat is available at the same time one-third of the Board turns over. The month before the district court issued its opinion, the people of Mississippi abolished by popular vote the LaBauve Fund seat. The governor appointed and the senate confirmed four white trustees and one black trustee for the end-of-term vacancies which occurred in 1972, 1976, 1980, and 1984. For intra-term vacancies, the appointments have always been white trustees.

5

347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954)

6

In 1962, Judge Wisdom, writing for our Court, ordered the University of Mississippi to admit a black transfer student named James Meredith. Meredith v. Fair, 305 F.2d 341 (5th Cir.1962). Meredith was a student at Jackson State College when he applied for admission to the University of Mississippi in January, 1961. He sought transfer because he found Jackson State College to be substandard. The University of Mississippi denied his admission application and in response Meredith filed suit in federal district court. Judge Wisdom wrote: "[t]he efforts of the Board of Trustees [of the State Institutions of Higher Learning] and the officials of the University of Mississippi together with various state officials, including the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor of the state of Mississippi, and the Mississippi Legislature to impede and deter efforts to integrate the student body at the University of Mississippi during the 1961-62 school year are well documented."

7

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1551

8

Id. at 1529

University of Mississippi ............. 1962
Mississippi State University .......... 1965
Mississippi University for Women ...... 1966
University of Southern Mississippi .... 1967
Delta State University ................ 1966
11

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1555

12

The record suggests that the availability of the high risk exceptions at the historically white schools were not well publicized in their recruiting materials. The president of the University of Southern Mississippi testified that he was reluctant to advertise the existence of the exceptions, and that the University of Southern Mississippi did not encourage applicants with less than 15 on the ACT to apply. Students with scores below 15 were automatically rejected. Their record was then reviewed at a later time in the spring or summer to determine if a department had requested a particular student's admission

The other historically white schools do not appear to admit large numbers of students with ACT scores below 15. In 1986, applicants with less than a 15 composite score on the ACT accounted for approximately nine percent of the entering class at Delta State University; approximately five percent at Mississippi State University; approximately four percent at the University of Mississippi, and zero percent at Mississippi University for Women. In contrast, over 50% of the freshmen admitted to each of the historically black institutions that year scored less than 15 on the ACT.

13

In 1985-86, roughly 7 of 10 white high school graduates and 3 of 10 black high school graduates scored 15 or higher on the ACT

14

Board exhibit 186 at 6-7 (emphasis added)

15

Plaintiff exhibit 350

16

Only 60 of the 2,563 faculty employed by the historically white institutions during the 1985-86 school year were black. Yet Dr. Lucious Williams, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, maintained that the University of Mississippi, from about 1983-86, kept a minority faculty vita bank with about 200 vita on file on an annual basis

There also appears to be a disparity between the extent of the faculty's education at the historically white institutions and the historically black institutions:

Historically White Institutions*

      Total     % Full Professors       % Instructors       % with Doctorate
UM     673           25.9%                 24.4%                 59.0%
MSU    895           42.8                   6.5                  70.0
USM    675           26.4                  12.9                  64.4
DSU    203           32.0                  20.7                  52.7
MUW    129           35.7                  14.0                  52.7

Historically Black Institutions**

      Total     % Full Professors       % Instructors       % with Doctorate
JSU    359           22.6%                 16.7%                 64.9%
ASU    174           10.9                  43.1                  46.6
MVSU   138           18.8                  21.7                  42.0
*

The acronyms for the historically white institutions are: (1) UM for the

University of Mississippi; (2) MSU for Mississippi State University;

(3) USM for the University of Southern Mississippi; (4) DSU for Delta

State University; and (5) MUW for Mississippi University for Women

17

United States exhibit 694(q)

Historically White Institutions:

                                     197980  198687
University of Mississippi            $20,794  $30,757
Mississippi State University          21,153   31,957
University of Southern Mississippi    19,817   31,964
Mississippi University for Women      17,836   26,507
Delta State University                17,265   26,213

Historically Black Institutions:

                                     197980  198687
Jackson State University             $18,047  $26,669
Alcorn State University               16,019   21,291
Mississippi Valley State University   15,546   22,746
18

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1563

19

Id. at 1537

20

Id. at 1538

21

United States Exhibit 1 at page 12

22

One objective of the Plan was to increase the employment of black administrators. At the historically white institutions, six of the 393 administrators (1.5%) were black at the time of the Plan. In 1983, nine years after the Plan was enacted, the percentage of black administrators for each institution was as follows:

Historically White Institutions:

University of Mississippi             2.9%
Mississippi State University          0.7%
University of Southern Mississippi    2.0%
Mississippi University for Women      0.0%
Delta State University                0.0%
Historically Black Institutions:
Jackson State University             94.1%
Alcorn State University              96.7%
Mississippi Valley State University  92.5%

Moreover, in 1986, at the highest administrative levels, the historically white institutions reported 22 officers, who were all white, despite a turnover of 15 positions since 1981. The historically black institutions had nine black officers and one white officer.

24

Disparities in program offerings between the historically black institutions and the historically white institutions continued to exist in 1985 and 1986 despite the promise of the Plan to give the historically black institutions priority for new programs. From 1975-86, the historically black institutions ranked lowest in the number of new programs approved by the Board:

Mississippi State University         22
Mississippi University for Women     17
University of Southern Mississippi   16
Jackson State University             15
Delta State University               15
University of Mississippi            14
Mississippi Valley State University   6
Alcorn State University               2

Although an institution's refusal or failure to request new programs could affect these rankings, they suggest that the Board did not make an affirmative effort to place new programs at the historically black universities.

In 1986, the institutions ranked as follows among other criteria:

               Historically White Institutions      Historically Black
                                                      Institutions
                 Historically White                     Historically Black
                    Institutions                           Institutions
Criteria         UM     MSU     USM    DSU    MUW     JSU      ASU       MVSU
-------------  -----------------------------------  ---------------------------
Number of        3       1       2      4      7       5        6         8
Bachelor
Programs
Number of        1       2       2      5      7       4        6         7
Graduate
Programs
Total            2       1       3      5      7       4        6         8
Programs
Fields-          2       2       1      4      6       5        6         8
Bachelors
Fields-          2       3       1      5      7       4        5         7
Masters
Fields-          1       3       2      4     --       4        --        --
Doctorate
Library          3       2       1      6      5       4        7         8
Volumes
Percentage of    2       1       4      3      7       5        5         8
Faculty with
Doctorate
Percentage of    1       2       4      5      8       3        6         6
Faculty with
Degree from
Research
University
Average          1       2       5      4      2       7        5         8
ACT Score

See supra note 16 for the meaning of the acronyms.

25

In contrast, necessary duplication refers to the idea that every campus needs to teach basic courses fundamental to a proper education. Core subjects such as English, Mathematics, and History are thus not counted in determining "unnecessary" program duplication

26

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1541

27

Id

28

Id

29

Id

30

Id. at 1551

31

Id. at 1542

32

Id

33

Id

34

Id

35

Meredith took judicial notice of this practice in 1962. Id. at 1551

36

Dr. Larry Leslie, the U.S. expert on funding, testified that the predominantly white institutions receive and spend more money on a per student basis. Dr. Leslie's analysis included revenues generated by more recent Board policies and practices which the district court found more favorable to the historically black institutions

37

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1551

38

Id. at 1547

39

Id. at 1561-62

40

Id. at 1548-50. The district court focused on square footage per student. Id. This measure, however, does not account for the quality, usefulness, efficiency, or, perhaps most importantly, the aesthetics of a structure. A large warehouse with concrete floors and tin walls may have the same square footage as the British Museum but that does not give the two facilities the same potential to pleasurably exhibit art

41

Id. at 1549

42

391 U.S. 430, 88 S.Ct. 1689, 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968)

43

Id. at 438, 88 S.Ct. at 1694

44

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1554

45

In a footnote in his dissent, Justice Douglas stated that the district court's rationale that the duty to desegregate a university system should be more narrow than the duty to desegregate an elementary school system "is on its face an amazing statement as the forerunners of Brown v. Board of Education....were cases involving higher education. See Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, ... Sweatt v. Painter, ...[and] McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education."

46

ASTA 289 F.Supp. at 788

47

Id

48

478 U.S. 385, 106 S.Ct. 3000, 92 L.Ed.2d 315 (1986)

49

Id. at 407-09, 106 S.Ct. at 3012-13

50

Id

51

Id. at 408, 106 S.Ct. at 3013

52

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1553

53

801 F.2d 799 (6th Cir.1986)

54

Id. at 804

55

163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896)

56

Id. at 804

57

Id. at 805; See Green 391 U.S. at 430, 88 S.Ct. at 1689 and Geier v. University of Tenn., 597 F.2d 1056 (6th Cir.1979)

58

Bazemore, 478 U.S. at 407, 106 S.Ct. at 3012

60

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337, 59 S.Ct. 232, 83 L.Ed. 208 (1938); McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Educ., 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct. 851, 94 L.Ed. 1149 (1950); Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 70 S.Ct. 848, 94 L.Ed. 1114 (1950); Brown, 347 U.S. at 483, 74 S.Ct. at 686. Similarly, we disagree with the three judge district court in United States v. Louisiana, 692 F.Supp. 642, 656 (E.D.La.1988) to the extent, and only to the extent, it borrowed this portion of the Geier analysis to distinguish Bazemore

61

Plessy, 163 U.S. at 537, 16 S.Ct. at 1138; Missouri ex rel. Gaines, 305 U.S. at 337, 59 S.Ct. at 233; Sweatt 339 U.S. at 629, 70 S.Ct. 848; McLaurin, 339 U.S. at 637, 70 S.Ct. at 851

62

Plessy, 163 U.S. at 550, 16 S.Ct. at 1143

63

Id. at 551, 16 S.Ct. at 1143 (emphasis added)

64

E. Foner, Reconstruction--America's Unfinished Revolution 1864-1877 xxv-xxvii (1988) (emphasis added)

65

305 U.S. 337, 59 S.Ct. 232

66

Missouri ex rel. Gaines, 305 U.S. at 349, 59 S.Ct. at 232

67

Sweatt, 339 U.S. at 629, 70 S.Ct. at 848

68

McLaurin, 339 U.S. at 637, 70 S.Ct. at 851

69

Sweatt, 339 U.S. at 631, 70 S.Ct. at 849

70

Id

71

Id. at 631-32, 70 S.Ct. at 849

72

Id. at 632, 70 S.Ct. at 849

73

Id. at 633, 70 S.Ct. at 850

74

Id. at 632, 70 S.Ct. at 849

75

Id. at 634-35, 70 S.Ct. at 850-51

76

McLaurin, 339 U.S. at 638, 70 S.Ct. at 852

77

Id

78

Id

79

Id

80

Id. at 640, 70 S.Ct. at 853. The University altered the conditions under which Mr. McLaurin attended school in the interval between the decision of the district court and the oral argument in the Supreme Court. The "section of the classroom in which appellant sat was surrounded by a rail on which there was a sign stating, 'Reserved for Colored,' but these have been removed. [At the time of oral argument, McLaurin was] assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for colored students; he [was] assigned to a table in the library on the main floor; and he [was] permitted to eat at the same time in the cafeteria as other students, although here again he [was] assigned to a special table." Id

81

Id

82

Id

83

Sweatt, 339 U.S. at 634, 70 S.Ct at 850

84

McLaurin, 339 U.S. at 641, 70 S.Ct. at 853

85

Id. at 641-42, 70 S.Ct. at 853-54

86

Charles Sumner made a similar argument in 1850 that failed to carry the day. In Brown, Chief Justice Warren attributed the phrase "separate but equal" in Plessy to a Massachusetts case that involved segregated schools in Boston, Massachusetts. Roberts v. City of Boston, 59 Mass. 198, 5 Cush. 198 (1850). In Roberts, Charles Sumner advocated the cause of five year old Sara Roberts before the Massachusetts Supreme Court, over ten years before the Civil War, arguing that Boston's segregation of black children branded them with a stigma of inferiority. Roberts, 59 Mass. at 203-04. In addition, Sumner argued that segregation injured white school children because their "hearts, while yet tender with childhood, are necessarily hardened by this conduct, and their subsequent lives, perhaps, bear enduring testimony to this legalized uncharitableness." See R. Kluger, Simple Justice 75-77 (1977)

87

Brown v. Board of Educ., 349 U.S. 294, 75 S.Ct. 753, 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II )

88

Id. at 300, 75 S.Ct. at 756. "To that end, the courts may consider problems related to administration, arising from the physical condition of the school plant, the school transportation system, personnel, revision of school districts and attendance areas into compact units to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a non-racial basis, and revision of local laws and regulations which may be necessary in solving the foregoing problems." Id. at 300-01, 75 S.Ct. at 756-57

89

Green, 391 U.S. at 430, 88 S.Ct. at 1690

90

Id. at 437-38, 88 S.Ct. at 1693-94

91

Id. at 435-36, 88 S.Ct. at 1692-93. See also Dayton Board of Educ. v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526, 537, 99 S.Ct. 2971, 2979, 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979) ("Given intentionally segregated schools in 1954, however, the Court of Appeals was quite right in holding that the Board was thereafter under a continuing duty to eradicate the effects of that system...."); Columbus Board of Educ. v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449, 460, 99 S.Ct. 2941, 2948, 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) ("The Board's continuing affirmative duty to disestablish the dual system is therefore beyond question."); Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 289-90, 97 S.Ct. 2749, 2761-62, 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977) ("More precisely, the burden of state officials is that set forth in Swann [v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) ]--to take the necessary steps to 'eliminate from the public schools all vestiges of state-imposed segregation.' "); Keyes v. School Dist. No. I, Denver, Colo., 413 U.S. 189, 200, 93 S.Ct. 2686, 2693, 37 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973) ("Rather, we have held that where plaintiffs prove that a current condition of segregated schools exists within a school district where a dual system was compelled or authorized by statute at the time of our decision in Brown ... the State automatically assumes an affirmative duty to 'effectuate a transition to a racially nondiscriminatory school system....' ") (citing Brown I, 347 U.S. at 483, 74 S.Ct. at 686); Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Educ., 396 U.S. 19, 20, 90 S.Ct. 29, 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969) (per curiam ) ("Under explicit holdings of this Court the obligation of every school district is to terminate dual school systems at once and to operate now and hereafter only unitary schools.")

92

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1551-54

93

Id

94

Id. at 1552-53

95

Green, 391 U.S. at 439, 88 S.Ct. at 1694

96

Plessy, 163 U.S. at 551, 16 S.Ct. at 1143 (emphasis added)

97

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1555

98

Mississippi's ACT policy could discourage potential black students from applying to the historically white universities. Cf. Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321, 330, 97 S.Ct. 2720, 2727, 53 L.Ed.2d 786 (1977) ("The application process might itself not adequately reflect the actual potential applicant pool, since otherwise qualified people might be discouraged from applying because of a self-recognized inability to meet the very standards challenged as being discriminatory.")

99

See supra note 12

100

See supra note 25

101

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1551

102

Id

103

Id

104

The United States intervened under 42 U.S.C. section 2000h-2 (1989) three months after the private plaintiffs filed their complaint against the state of Mississippi. This provision entitles the United States to the relief that it would have obtained if it had initiated the action

105

42 U.S.C. section 2000d et seq. (amended Oct. 21, 1986, Pub.L. 99-506, Title X, section 1003, 100 Stat. 1845; Mar. 22, 1988, Pub.L. 100-259, Title VI, section 606, 102 Stat. 31)

106

34 C.F.R. sections 100.1-100.13 (1988)

107

42 U.S.C. section 2000d (1981)

108

Ayers, 674 F.Supp. at 1551 n. 7

109

42 U.S.C. section 2000d-4a (1989) (entitled " 'Program or activity' defined"). We do not have to decide whether the plaintiff's must prove discriminatory intent instead of discriminatory impact. Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 293, 105 S.Ct. 712, 716, 83 L.Ed.2d 661 (1985) (Title VI itself reaches only instances of intentional discrimination although the implementing regulations could allow a disparate impact analysis.). Cf. Guardians Ass'n v. Civil Service Comm'n of the City of N.Y., 463 U.S. 582, 607, n. 27, 103 S.Ct. 3221, 3235, n. 27, 77 L.Ed.2d 866 (1983) (Proof of intentional discrimination is necessary for the recovery of compensatory damages although only proof of discriminatory impact is necessary in a suit to enforce the regulations adopted under Title VI.). Our case involves past intentional discrimination continuing to the present through a breach of the affirmative duty placed on the state by Green

110

465 U.S. 555, 104 S.Ct. 1211, 79 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984)

111

Id. at 570-76, 104 S.Ct. at 1219-23

112

Id. at 563-70, 104 S.Ct. at 1216-19

113

Pub.L. 100-259, 102 Stat. 28, 42 U.S.C. section 2000d-4a (1988)

114

42 U.S.C. section 2000d-4a(2)(A) (1988)

115

Id

116

See Bonner v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections, 714 F.Supp. 420, 422 (D.Ariz.1989) (Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 applies retroactively); United States v. Berg, 710 F.Supp. 438, 442 (E.D.N.Y.1989) ("[W]here Congress clearly indicates its intention to reject a recent Supreme Court interpretation and restore the law to its former state, retroactive application of a newly enacted statute is appropriate."); Leake v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 695 F.Supp. 1414, 1417-18 (E.D.N.Y.1988) (Terms "program or activity" in the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 apply retroactively) aff'd, 869 F.2d 130 (2nd Cir.1989); Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi, 832 F.2d 748, 755 (2nd Cir.1987) ("The 1986 amendment in the present case [the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986] simply codifies a congressional purpose long in place which Congress believed the Supreme Court had misinterpreted" so the plaintiffs could bring suit under the Act even though the Act was passed one year after the suit was brought.)

117

Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 395 U.S. 367, 380-81, n. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1794, 1801-02, n. 6, 23 L.Ed.2d 371, n. 6 (1969); Glidden v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530, 541, 82 S.Ct. 1459, 1468, 8 L.Ed.2d 671 (1962) (opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, joined by Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart); Federal Housing Admin. v. Darlington Inc., 358 U.S. 84, 90, 79 S.Ct. 141, 145, 3 L.Ed.2d 132 (1958)

118

There was no house report

119

S.Rep. No. 100-64, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 2-5, reprinted in 1988 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin.News 3-7 (bill introduced "to overturn the Supreme Court's 1984 decision in Grove City College v. Bell ... and to restore the effectiveness and vitality of the four major civil rights statutes that prohibit discrimination in federally assisted programs.")

120

N.L.R.B. Hendricks County, 454 U.S. 170, 177, 102 S.Ct. 216, 222, 70 L.Ed.2d 323 (1981); N.L.R.B. v. Bell Aerospace, 416 U.S. 267, 274-75, 94 S.Ct. 1757, 1761-62, 40 L.Ed.2d 134 (1974); Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 395 U.S. 367, 381, 89 S.Ct. 1794, 1801, 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969); Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16, 85 S.Ct. 792, 801, 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965)

121

In addition, Public Law 100-259 does not have an effective date, this is unusual