Unpublished Dispositionluttenberger Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Helical Dynamics, Inc., Defendant-appellant, 887 F.2d 1087 (6th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseBefore MERRITT, Chief Judge, KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge, and DOUGLAS W. HILLMAN, Chief District Judge.*
PER CURIAM.
Defendant-appellant, Helical Dynamics Inc., (Helical), has appealed from the magistrate's final judgment,1 rendered subsequent to a bench trial, in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Luttenberger Roofing and Sheet Metal Company (Luttenberger), in this breach of contract action.
Upon review of Helical's assignments of error, the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel, this court concludes that the magistrates findings of fact and conclusions of law were correct. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the magistrate's memoranda and orders dated May 18, 1988 and June 29, 1988, the judgment of the magistrate is AFFIRMED in its entirety.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.