United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Carol Amend, Defendant-appellant, 887 F.2d 1081 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 887 F.2d 1081 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted: Aug. 24, 1989. Decided: Oct. 5, 1989

Carol Amend, appellant pro se.

Joseph Roberts McCrorey (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Carol Amend appeals from the district court's order denying her "motion for return of property." Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Amend, CR No. 84-130 (D.S.C. July 1, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adquately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.