Marvin A. Leifried, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Kolibash, Harold F. Salsbery, Ferris R. Bond, Johnnyj. Jackson, Jane Doe, John Doe, Defendants-appellees, 884 F.2d 1389 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseMarvin A. Leifried, appellant pro se.
Betsy Clare Steinfeld, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Marvin A. Leifried appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Bivens1 and RICO action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leifried v. Kolibash, C/A No. 87-385-A (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.2
AFFIRMED.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
As the Court has already reviewed the transcripts at issue in Leifried's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 action, we deny his motion for production of transcripts at government expense
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
