Allen E. Harper, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Law Office, Individually, Jointly and in Its Officialcapacity As Litigation Service; William L.marquat, Individually, and in Hisofficial Capacity As Appointedlegal Counsel,defendants-appellees, 867 F.2d 608 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 867 F.2d 608 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted: Nov. 30, 1988. Decided: Jan. 18, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Feb. 14, 1989

Allen E. Harper, appellant pro se.

Margaret Moran McKee, A. Gwynn Bowie, Jr. (Smith, Somerville & Case), for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Allen E. Harper appeals from the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in Harper's action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 338 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harper v. Law Office, C/A No 83-3840-JH, (D. Md. May 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.