United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William Julius Lott, Defendant-appellant, 866 F.2d 1416 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseWilliam Julius Lott, appellant pro se.
John Granville Douglass, Wright, Robinson, McCammon, Osthimer & Tatum, for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Julius Lott appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion reveals that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lott, CR 84-225-Y, CA 86-2637-Y (D. Md. Feb. 11, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.