Phillip Paul Jenkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Phillip Dantes, Chairman; Jon P. Galley, Acting Warden,m.c.t.c., Individually and in Their Capacity Within Themaryland Parole Commission, and the Maryland Division Ofcorrections Under State Law, Defendants-appellees, 866 F.2d 1415 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CasePhillip Paul Jenkins, appellant pro se.
Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Paul Jenkins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jenkins v. Dantes, C/A No. 88-82-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 14, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
