Unpublished Dispositionj.e. Hurley Machine and Boiler Works and Hartford Accident &indemnity Co., Petitioners, v. Irving S. Foltz and Director, Office of Workers'compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor,respondents, 865 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 865 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Dec. 30, 1988

Before STARR, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This petition for review was considered on the record from an order of the Benefits Review Board. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Benefits Review Board's decision issued December 30, 1987, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's order of December 15, 1983, denying the award of special fund relief, be affirmed. Appellants have failed to demonstrate that the Administrative Law Judge's determination was not based upon substantial evidence, rational and in accordance with prevailing law. O'Keefe v. Smith, Hinchman and Grylls Associates, Inc., 380 U.S. 359, 32 (1965); Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, 613 F.2d 972, 980 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 448 U.S. 907 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.