Unpublished Dispositionearle A. Daisley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. General Electric Company, Defendant-appellee, 865 F.2d 1257 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseEarle A. Daisley, appellant pro se.
Stanley Mazaroff (Venable, Baetjer & Howard), for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Earle A. Daisley appeals from the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daisley v. General Electric Co., CA-84-3216 (D. Md. May 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
