Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,064james L. Shores, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Clarence E.bishop, Jr., on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Whopurchased First Mortgage 8% Revenue Bonds Issued by Theindustrial Board of the Town of Frisco City, Alabama,plaintiff-appellant, v. Jerald H. Sklar, et al., Defendants-appellees, 855 F.2d 722 (11th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseW. Eugene Rutledge, Rutledge & Kelly, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
Crawford S. McGivaren, Jr., Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal, Larry B. Childs, Birmingham, Ala., for Jerald H. Sklar, et al.
Lee H. Zell, Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner, Susan Salonimer, Birmingham, Ala., for Asa G. Candler.
Frank M. Young, III, Haskell, Slaughter & Young, James L. Richey, Birmingham, Ala., for Cecil J. Lamberson & Jackson Municipals, Inc.
Hobart A. McWhorter, Jr., Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Richard H. Walston, Henry E. Simpson, Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., for Capell, Howard, Knabe & Cobbs.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, James Hughes Hancock, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
(Opinion May 10, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 844 F.2d 1485)
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges* .
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 17, 1988, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Judge Vance is recused and did not participate in this decision
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
