Unpublished Dispositionfred Ratliff, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Otie Jones, Warden; Steve Norris, Commissioner; Dennisworley, Cpl.; Jewel Norman; Lucy Cox,defendants-appellees, 853 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore LIVELY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his action as being time-barred. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Upon review, we conclude that plaintiff's suit was time-barred and properly dismissed.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
