Unpublished Dispositionrichard Folkes, Petitioner-appellant, v. Joseph Janesz, Chief Probation Officer, Cuyahoga Countycommon Pleas Court, Respondent-appellee, 849 F.2d 609 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore LIVELY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This Ohio petitioner appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Petitioner asserted eight grounds to support his claim that he was denied due process.
Upon review, we conclude the district court properly dismissed this suit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of dismissal. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
