Josh Matthews, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sgt. Benthall, Guard Whitaker, Guard Mayo, Defendants-appellees, 846 F.2d 72 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseJosh Matthews, appellant pro se.
LaVee Hamer Jackson, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Matthews v. Benthall, C/A No. 86-1262-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
