Amity Leather Products Co., Appellant, v. Gary Alter, Appellee, 845 F.2d 1033 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 845 F.2d 1033 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Feb. 4, 1988

Before RICH, EDWARD S. SMITH, and NIES, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.


DECISION

The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) in opposition No. 69,692, dismissing the opposition of Amity Leather Products Co. (Amity) to the registration of "AMITY" on the principal register as a trademark for "hose," application serial No. 368,689 filed June 9, 1982, is affirmed.

OPINION

Amity opposed under Sec. 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 USC 1052(d), based on its five registrations for the trademark "AMITY" or incorporating that word for leather goods and other personal accessories. These goods are unrelated to the applicant's hosiery except for the fact that they are often sold in the same retail stores. The board found that Amity's trademark is well known in the leather goods field but that it is not so famous that purchasers of hose would assume that they came from a common source.

After full consideration of the facts of record and the arguments of the parties, we agree with the board that there would be no likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Sec. 2(d). We add to the board's reference to "common source" that we do not think purchasers would believe that the goods have a common sponsorship, under the circumstances of this case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.