Martha S. Murray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Department of the Army; William Edmundson, Director Ofeducation, Fort Bragg, Nc, Defendants-appellees, 842 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseMartha S. Murray, appellant pro se.
James Gordon Carpenter, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Robert Lynn Minor, Office of the Judge Advocate General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing Murray's Title VII action is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Murray v. Department of the Army, C/A No. 87-16-7-CIV (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
