Martin John Cunningham, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of Maryland, Respondent-appellee.martin John Cunningham, Petitioner-appellant, v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, Respondent-appellee, 842 F.2d 1289 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 842 F.2d 1289 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted Nov. 30, 1987. Decided March 3, 1988

Martin John Cunningham, appellant pro se.

Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals from its orders refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 86-3535-B (D. Md. Aug. 24, 1987) and Cunningham v. Warden, C/A No. 86-159-B (D. Md. May 21, 1987).

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.