Unpublished Dispositioneddie C. Rhodes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, et al., Defendants,guillermo Martinez, M.d.; Gerald Rosenberg, M.d.,defendants-appellees, 840 F.2d 17 (6th Cir. 1988)

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

This pro se Ohio state prisoner appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. Upon review, we conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint.

Accordingly, for the reasons contained in the magistrate's report dated July 6, 1987, as adopted by the district court, the dismissal of the complaint is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.