Unpublished Dispositionpaul Fazzini, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Gluch, Respondent-appellee, 840 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 840 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1988) Feb. 18, 1988

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and SPIEGEL, District Judge.* 

ORDER

This pro se petitioner appeals a judgment of the district court which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has submitted motions to compel discovery, to supplement the record, for a preliminary injunction, and for expedited review. Upon examination of the record and the briefs filed by the parties, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

For the reasons stated in the district court's order of dismissal, petitioner's motions to compel discovery, to supplement the record, for a preliminary injunction and for expedited review are hereby denied and the final judgment entered August 24, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable S. Arthur Spiegel, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.