Billie Jean C. Barlow, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Esselte Pendaflex Corporation, Meto Division, Defendant-appellee, 838 F.2d 1209 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBillie Jean C. Barlow, appellant pro se.
Richard V. Bennett, Bell, Davis & Pitt, PA, Brian S. Conneely, Meltzer, Lippe & Goldstein, P.C., for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing the complaint is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny the appellant's motion for oral argument, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Barlow v. Esselte Pendaflex, C/A No. 85-1061-WS (M.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1987)
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
