Unpublished Dispositionedward K. Shigemura, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Gluch, Respondent-appellee, 835 F.2d 879 (6th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore DAVID A. NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Petitioner appeals the district court's judgment denying habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter has been referred to a panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the parties' briefs and the certified record, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Petitioner claims that he is illegally confined because the Parole Commission deprived him of his right to appeal his parole revocation and because he has been denied credit to his sentence.
Upon consideration, we affirm the district court's judgment for reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated May 8, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
