Graydon Roger Boles, Plaintiff-appellant, v. T.e. Ellis, T.d. Cox, Defendants-appellees,danna Mullinnix, Defendant, 831 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard G. Erwin, District Judge. (C/A No. 83-613-C-G).
Graydon Roger Boles, appellant pro se.
Kenneth Keller, Tuggle, Duggins, Meschan & Elrod, P.A., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying plaintiff's motion for relief from the judgment entered in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Boles v. Ellis, C/A No. 83-613-C-G (M.D.N.C. May 18, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
