James Woodrow Mcneil, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, William P. Rogers, Thomas R. Israel,defendants-appellees, 831 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJames Woodrow McNeil, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Office of Attorney General, for appellees.
Before SPROUSE, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from his order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. McNeil v. Murray, C/A No. 87-24-H (W.D. Va., May 5, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
