Argentina Mims, Plaintiff-appellant, v. George Allen Anderson, Esquire, Individually and in Hisofficial Capacity, Defendant-appellee, 826 F.2d 1060 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseArgentina Mims, appellant pro se.
James Warner Alford, Barnes, Alford, Stork & Johnson, for appellee.
Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* Mims v. Anderson, C/A No. 86-1789 (D.S.C., Feb. 17, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
We do not find the allegations made in plaintiff's motion to amend sufficient to establish a basis for relief under Sec. 1983
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
