James Harrelson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lynn Oehling; Mr. Creecy; Aaron Johnson, Defendants-appellees, 826 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJames Harrelson, appellant pro se.
Tiare Bowe Smiley, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny the request for appointment of counsel, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Harrelson v. Oehling, C/A No. 86-734-CRT (E.D.N.C., Mar. 27, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
