Unpublished Dispositionthomas Robert Stimac, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Gluch, Respondent-appellee, 815 F.2d 706 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 815 F.2d 706 (6th Cir. 1987) March 25, 1987

Before KRUPANSKY, NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court judgment which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2241). The judgment was entered on November 25, 1986, and on December 5, 1986, appellant filed a "request for relief from judgment and order" in which appellant argued that the judgment was erroneous. The "request for relief" is properly construed as a motion to alter or amend under Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Huff v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 675 F.2d 119 (6th Cir. 1982). As such, it tolled the time for filing a notice of appeal. Rule 4(a) (4), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 (1982). The "request for relief" had not been disposed of when the notice of appeal was filed January 26, 1987, and the notice of appeal was thus prematurely filed. The proper procedure is to file a new notice of appeal within 60 days of entry of the order which disposes of the "request for relief from judgment." Rule 4(a) (4), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The district court entered an order denying appellant's "request for relief from judgment" on February 5, 1987. Appellant has until April 6, 1987, to file a new notice of appeal so as to ensure that this Court has jurisdiction.

For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is dismissed. Rule 9(b) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.