Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul A. Bisig, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 815 F.2d 706 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 815 F.2d 706 (6th Cir. 1987) March 18, 1987

Before ENGEL, KRUPANSKY and GUY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In this case defendant filed a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, seeking modification of a 1984 drug-related conviction. The district court denied an initial motion, a second motion, and a motion for reconsideration. This appeal followed the denial of the motion to reconsider the second motion. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues.

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court in the order denying reconsideration.

It is therefore ORDERED that the final order of the district court be affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.