United States of America, Appellee, v. Rodney Patterson, Appellant,, 808 F.2d 836 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseBefore WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
Rodney Patterson, pro se.
Wendy Arnell, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Patterson, CR-82-00513; C/A No. HM-85-1855 (D. Md., Dec. 19, 1985).
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court order did not expressly state that the court had considered Patterson's objections and conducted de novo review, we find that the arguments made in Patterson's objections are without merit. Therefore, any failure of the district court to review the objections is harmless error
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
