Steven C. Wilson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James D. Llewellyn; Charles C. Lamm, Jr. Defendants-appellees, 808 F.2d 836 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseBefore WIDENER, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Steven C. Wilson, pro se.
Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Llewellyn, C/A No. 85-1481-CRT (E.D.N.C., Mar. 28 and May 8, 1986).*
AFFIRMED.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the post-trial motion for rehearing, new trial, and amendment of the judgment
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
