Luther G. Daniel, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Army Judge Advocate General; Charles E. Franklin;imron A. Shilleh; C. Eighton Rhea; U.s.department of Justice; U.S. Attorneygeneral; L.w. Wood, Jr.,defendants-appellees, 808 F.2d 834 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 808 F.2d 834 (4th Cir. 1986) Submitted Oct. 23, 1986. Decided Dec. 11, 1986

Before HALL, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

Luther G. Daniel, appellant pro se.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Daniel v. U.S. Army Judge Advocate General, C/A No. 86-12-M (N.D.W. Va., June 13, 1986). Appellant's motion for consideration of the briefs submitted on appeal is granted. Appellant's motion for a stay and injunction pending appeal and his motions for extraordinary and other relief are denied.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.