United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles Most, A/k/a Charles Gorman, A/k/a Carl David Weis,defendant-appellant, 806 F.2d 258 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 806 F.2d 258 (4th Cir. 1986) Submitted Oct. 10, 1986. Decided Nov. 26, 1986

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., District Judge. (CR No. 84-00006-02; C/A No. 85-0915-R)

Charles Most, appellant pro se.

Robert William Jaspen, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. We also deny Most's request for the appointment of counsel. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Most, CR-84-00006-02; C/A No. 85-0915-R (E.D. Va., April 28, 1986).

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.