David Wilkins, Plaintiff-appellant, v. S.e. Webb, Classification Counselor; Elmanus Herndon,deputy Commissioner; Bernard Smith, Assistant Warden;william J. Kunkel, Chairman Md. Parole Commission and Howardlyles, Warden, Defendants-appellees, 804 F.2d 678 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseDavid Wilkins, appellant pro se.
Stephen Howard Sachs, J. Marks Moore, Glenn William Bell, for appellees.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Webb, C/A No. 85-2860-N (D. Md., May 12, 1986).1
AFFIRMED.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilkins' motion for leave to file a supplemental claim
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
