James Christopher Austin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. W.d. Blankenship; R.a. Young; W.f. Ammonette; J.l.hylton; Harold Thompson, Defendants-appellees, 804 F.2d 677 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseJames Christopher Austin, appellant pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Austin v. Blankenship, C/A No. 86-249-R (W.D. Va., July 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
