Graydon Roger Boles, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bill Mccaskill, Defendant-appellee, 804 F.2d 677 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseGraydon R. Boles, appellant pro se.
Richard L. Vanore, for appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing Boles' civil rights action is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Boles v. McCaskill, C/A No. 85-571-G (M.D.N.C., April 22, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
