Unpublished Dispositionjohn David Mosley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lt. Bobby Loafman, et al., Defendants-appellees, 785 F.2d 309 (6th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 785 F.2d 309 (6th Cir. 1986) 1/27/86

ORDER

The matter is before the Court for consideration of plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel and appeal from the District Court's order of summary judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 9(a). Upon examination of the certified record and plaintiff's informal brief filed on appeal, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants, security guards and a nurse at DeBerry Correctional Institution in Nashville, Tennessee, violated his constitutional rights by using excessive force, to administer a behavior modification medication, i.e. prolixin, to him by injection. A physician had ordered that the medication be given to plaintiff to modify his behavior even if force was necessary. Based upon the affidavits filed in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment, the District Court found that the force used by defendants to effectuate the physician's orders and to insure their safety was not excessive. The conclusionary allegation in plaintiff's pleading, without factual support, was insufficient to raise an issue of fact. We agree.

It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for counsel be denied and the District Court's decision affirmed. Rule 9(d) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.