Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hunting Creek, Ltd., I, Defendant-appellee, and Victor D.merullo, Receiver-appellee, 779 F.2d 53 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 779 F.2d 53 (6th Cir. 1985) 10/22/85

VACATED AND REMANDED

S.D. Ohio

ORDER

Before: MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.


Upon a full consideration of the briefs filed herein, the orders entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, on November 1, 1984, and August 13, 1985, and the oral presentations made to this Court on August 29, 1985, it is concluded that the District Court erred by denying the Department of Housing and Urban Development ('HUD') an immediate marshal sale of the property which was the subject of the District Court's Decree in Foreclosure and Judgment On Indebtedness entered on April 3, 1984, that the August 13, 1985 District Court order requiring, in essence, a private sale, will further delay HUD's right to a prompt sale of the property, and that Appellant is, therefore, entitled to receive, under the procedures set forth in 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001(a) and 2002, a prompt public marshal sale of the foreclosed property.

IT IS ORDERED that the Opinion and Order of the District Court dated November 1, 1984, and Order of the District Court dated August 13, 1985, are hereby VACATED and this case REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this Order.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.