Unpublished Dispositioncharles Booker, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dale Foltz, Respondent-appellee, 772 F.2d 905 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 772 F.2d 905 (6th Cir. 1985) 8/29/85

E.D. Mich.

APPEAL DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: MARTIN, JONES and wellford, circuit Judges.


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and response to this Court's June 25, 1985, order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It appears from the record that the judgment was entered November 21, 1984. The notice of appeal filed on December 24, 1984 was three days late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and hereby is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.