16 Fair Empl.prac.cas. 997, 15 Empl. Prac.dec. P 7875ernest Herrera et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellees, 560 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir. 1977)
Annotate this CaseRuben Montemayor, Harry A. Nass, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Paul Scott Kelly, Jr., Raymond F. Beagle, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for Yellow Freight System, Inc.
Edward W. Penshorn, Bradford F. Miller, San Antonio, Tex., for Local 657.
Hal K. Gillespie, G. William Baab, Dallas, Tex., for Southern Conference of Teamsters.
Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1977, 431 U.S. 952, 97 S. Ct. 2669, 53 L. Ed. 2d 268, vacated the judgment of this Court in Herrera v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 505 F.2d 66, and remanded the cause to this Court for further consideration in light of East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 1977, 431 U.S. 395, 97 S. Ct. 1891, 52 L. Ed. 2d 453.
We now hold that the District Court did not err in denying relief on the ground that none of the plaintiffs (city drivers) could satisfy the qualifications for a road driver because of age or weight or driving record. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
