John Wesley Clutchette et al., Appellees, v. Jerry J. Enomoto1 et al., Appellants, 536 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1976)
Annotate this CaseWilliam D. Stein, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
William Bennett Turner (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
ORDER
Before TUTTLE,* HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
Insofar as our opinions in Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 809, and Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1975) 510 F.2d 613, are inconsistent with Enomoto v. Clutchette, sub nom. Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976) --- U.S. ----, 96 S. Ct. 1551, 47 L. Ed. 2d 810, we vacate our prior opinions.
The cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Baxter v. Palmigiano, supra.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.