United States of America, Appellee, v. Henry Ogle Watson, Appellant, 532 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1976)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 532 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1976) April 22, 1976

Michael D. Nasatir (argued), Nasatir, Sherman & Hirsch, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

William D. Keller, U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

OPINION

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY,*  District Judge.

PER CURIAM:


We originally reversed Watson's conviction, holding that certain incriminating evidence should have been suppressed. 504 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1974). Judge Goodwin dissented.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded the cause for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion. 423 U.S. 411, 96 S. Ct. 820, 46 L. Ed. 2d 598, 44 U.S.L.W. 4112 (1976).

The mandate of the Supreme Court has now been received. Pursuant to that mandate and our further consideration of Watson's appeal in the light of the Supreme Court's opinion, we now hold that Watson's judgment of conviction should be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

 *

Honorable W.D. Murray, Senior United States District Judge, Butte, Montana, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.