Carolina Action, Appellant, v. William E. Simon, Secretary of the Treasury of the Unitedstates, et al., Appellees, 522 F.2d 295 (4th Cir. 1975)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 522 F.2d 295 (4th Cir. 1975) Argued April 8, 1975. Decided June 25, 1975

Thomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, N. C. (Ann F. Loflin, Loflin & Loflin, Durham, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., and William H. Guy, Associate Atty., N. C. Dept. of Justice, on brief for amicus curiae Atty. Gen. of N. C.

John T. Morrisey, Sr., Raleigh, N. C., and Charles Ronald Aycock, Raleigh, on brief for amicus curiae N. C. Ass'n of County Commissioners.

Edward R. Slaughter, Jr., and Jay T. Swett, McGuire, Woods & Battle, Charlottesville, Va., on brief for amicus curiae National Ass'n of Counties.

Michael A. McCord, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice (Wallace H. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., U. S. Atty., Ronald V. Shearin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Raymond N. Zagone, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, on brief), for appellee William E. Simon.

W. I. Thornton, Jr., City Atty. (Rufus C. Boutwell, Jr., Douglas A. Johnston, Asst. City Attys., on brief), for appellee City of Durham.

Robert D. Holleman, Durham, N. C., for appellee County of Durham.

Before ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge,*  and CRAVEN and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


The question on appeal is whether disbursement by the Secretary of the Treasury of revenue sharing funds under the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, 31 U.S.C. § 1221 Et seq., is major federal action substantially affecting the environment so as to require preparation of an environmental impact statement. The question arises in the context of the proposed new County Judicial Building and new City Hall in Durham, North Carolina.

The district court dismissed the action brought by the appellant for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Fed. R. Civ. P. For the reasons stated by Judge Gordon in an excellent memorandum opinion we hold that the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Et seq., does not apply to a project in which the only federal participation is the distribution of revenue sharing funds to aid local communities in financing the project. The decision below will be

Affirmed.

 *

First Circuit, Sitting by Designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.