National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Ruby Concrete Company, Respondent, 519 F.2d 1375 (6th Cir. 1975)
Annotate this CaseElliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.
Joseph A. Yocum, Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, Evansville, Ind., for respondent.
Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This case is before the court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 213 NLRB No. 103. Upon due consideration this court holds that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The court further concludes that it was within the discretion of the Board to order the respondent to bargain with the union under the facts of this case. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S. Ct. 1918, 23 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1969).
The order of the Board is enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
