Johnny R. Martinez, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department Ofcorrections Respondent-appellee, 466 F.2d 522 (5th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseJohnny R.Martinez, pro se.
Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen., Lonny Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Before SIMPSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Having concluded that this Court is without jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal, the appeal is dismissed.1 Rule 4(a), F.R.A.P., Jackson v. Decker, 5th Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 348.
It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
