United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. William Randolph, Jr., Aka Clarence Randolph, Aka Bobbymoore, Defendant-appellant, 456 F.2d 689 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CasePaul H. Lamboley, Reno, Nev., for defendant-appellant.
Joseph L. Ward, U. S. Atty., Raymond B. Little, Lawrence J. Semenza, Asst. U. S. Attys., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.
We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.
On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph's testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
