United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael John Stinson, Defendant-appellant, 450 F.2d 336 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseNeil Horton (argued), of Johnston, Klein, Horton & Solomon, Oakland, Cal., for appellant.
James Bruen, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Crim. Div., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The record shows that when the local board classified appellant 1-A, the decision was made by less than a quorum of the Board. The classification was therefore invalid and cannot support the order of induction. When the mandate goes down, the indictment will be dismissed.
Reversed.
Honorable Ray McNichols, United States District Judge, District of Idaho, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
