United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee. v. Adolfo De La Parra, Appellant, 445 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1971)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 445 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1971)

J. B. Tietz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Brian J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim.Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We reject the double jeopardy argument on this conviction for failure to take a selective service physical examination which he had been ordered to take.

We do not find the punitive aspects here that were present in United States v. Hayden, 9 Cir., 445 F.2d 1365 decided April 9, 1971, which is clearly distinguishable.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.